Name: Fani Tsaroucha
Age: 33
Country: Greece/Kenya
A Sunrise or a Sunset at the Maasailand
Part 1: The written submission
The Kuku Group Ranch is a private conservancy reserve in the Chyulu Hills of South Kenya. Only 80 km away from the Tanzanian border, on the foothill of Mount Kilimanjaro, the Maasai communities of the Chyulu Hills live an ongoing fight to survive the dramatic yearly climate alterations at this site of the Equator. Every year in East Africa, two rainy seasons (one starting in October and a second one in May) succeed two dry ones. This climate pattern is the main driver behind the famous seasonal wildlife migration that takes place every year in East Africa. Every year, wildebeest, zebras, elephants and their predators follow the emerging grasslands along a pathway from Kenya to Tanzania and backways. This pathway has been carved for centuries. In a similar way, the resilient Maasai have learned how to master the seasonal climate shifts and live a nomadic life with their livestock. Over generations the Maasai pastoralists of the Kuku group ranch and their cattle were moving from grassland to grassland across the Chyulu Hills, co-existing closely with the extraordinary wildlife of the savannah, continually adjusting to the demands of a variable climate. The Maasai are ambassadors of an ancient culture, customs and knowledge that may provide the world with significant lessons on climate change adaptation and nature conservation.
However, the existence of the Maasai tribe at this time is at risk. As pastoralists with an oral culture, they have lower levels of literacy which consequently leads to poor representation in their countries’ parliaments. The Maasais’ land rights are not well constitutionalized and are not included in land policies. When decisions are made concerning the Maasai lands, their communities are left out of the process. Development policies also fall into error. During recent decades, the development programmes across rural Africa were applying a type of community settlement around one borehole, one school and one medical center. In that way, access to education, food, water, and healthcare can be monitored. No matter how bright that concept might sound, it can only work for settled farming communities. In the case of nomadic pastoralists, that style of community settlement runs the risk of the land being degraded since the herds are forced to continually graze over the same patches of land. This was the case for the Maasai-lands at the Kuku group ranch reserve. Because of the aforementioned international and Kenyan development policies, the land in this semi-arid area has been severely overgrazed and degraded. Erosive rainfall events of every rainy season act as an additional degrading factor since they flush the fertile surface topsoil out of the land. Climate change can only worsen the status of the land with more intense and erosive precipitation events during the rainy season and with more severe droughts during the dry seasons. Maasai herders cannot manage their pasture depending on the annual climate variability and grass coverage as they used to. At the same time, the area where they are confined, cannot provide the food for the livestock as before. These days, the repercussions of a changing climate can be tremendous both on an individual and on a community level for the Maasai of the Chyulu Hills.
Over the past three years, a promising land and water restoration project has been running in the area and offers several solutions. The project has installed soil and water conservation interventions of semi-circular shape across three extended areas of land. The “semi-circular bunds” keep the water in the soil for longer period, and they prevent erosion and regreen the land. But the commitment of the project does not stop there. Its biggest aspiration is based on a simple approach to the water cycle and its effect on the micro- and macro-climate. The main idea is that more vegetation cover produces more evapotranspiration, which can potentially further increase the precipitation on a local micro-climate scale. This process consequently generates a domino effect as re-greening enhances the local precipitation patterns and so forth. If several intervention projects are strategically installed over a bigger area of land, some hydrologists hypothesize that the effect could be magnified and extended to a macro-climate scale. The inverse hypothesis has been already proven, as deforestation is associated with subsequent decreasing precipitation records. More research is still required to support such speculation concerning the effects of semi-circular bunds.
The short-term effects of the bunds on the soil and water restoration and on the increased vegetation cover have already been noticed and utilized by the locals in the project areas. The engagement and participation of the Maasai in this project is strong. However, as a white western researcher myself participating in the project initiated and funded by international funds, I kept thinking: “Is this another western conceptualization of how African communities should manage their own land?” and “To what extent are the Maasai, their knowledge, their needs and their intrinsic character included in the decision process?” and “How effective can this project be in the long run, when Maasai communities and their land rights are still not adequately represented in their constitution?”
Part 2: The image submission